Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146 Genova, Italy
How to cite: Bersani (2018). Science and society: let’s stay in touch. Fossilia, Volume 2018: 1-2. https://doi.org/10.32774/FosRepPal.20.1810.S10102
- Science and society have a very strong link and we, as scientists, should consider how to improve our communication and dissemination skills to implement a positive feedback;
- New internet-based media provide an unprecedented opportunity to be give a significant contribution for all the scientists never involved in traditional communication;
- The public is variegated and unpredictable, but interested and curious: we can reach (and satisfy) a large audience with a relatively small effort
- The experience of Scientificast, Italian blog and podcast, is a successful example of new media exploitation for science communication, with thousands of people involved for each post or episode;
- We identified as keys for our success the involvement of young, motivated scientists with a well-defined target and style, a format that can be replicated, modified and improved by other groups.
Keywords: Science Communication; Podcast; Blog; New Media.
The science communication ecosystem
Master in Science Communication - Interdisciplinary Laboratory For Advanced Studies (ILAS) - International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste TS; email@example.com
How to cite: Tavecchio (2018). The science communication ecosystem. Fossilia, Volume 2018: 3-5. https://doi.org/10.32774/FosRepPal.20.1810.S20305
- The credibility of science as an institution is itself dependent on the credibility of science communication.
- Science communication is best understood as an ecosystem, with many stakeholders and forces interacting and contributing to the construction of shared meanings about science and scientists
- The current science communication ecosystem is characterized by the loss of trusted gatekeepers and by the blurring between different genres of communication (especially self-promotion, advertising and informational content).
- There is very little to no correlation between lay public knowledge about science and attitudes towards science; trust is very often the critical factor.
Keywords: Science popularization; society; credibility; communication ecosystem.
- Guenther L. & Weingart P. (2016). Science communication and the issue of trust. Journal of Science Communication, 15 (05): C3.
- Marcinkowski F. & Kohring M. (2014). The changing rationale of science communication: a challenge to scientific autonomy. Journal of Science Communication, 13 (3): 1–8.
- Peters H. P. (2013). ‘Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators’. PNAS, 110 (Supplement 3): 14102–14109.
- Shipman M. (2014). ‘Public relations as science communication’ - Journal of Science Communication, 13 (03): C05.